Weblog

Tuesday, 13 October 2009

  • "Reading"

    So, I have a lot of free time after work, and no internet, so if I'm not hanging out with Lisa (doesn't happen often now that she's working full-time) or going to some event or another (it's been a slow week!) I either sit around, read, or draw (YES! I stole/borrowed these awesome art brush/pens from work and I've been sketching, stay tuned for uploads!). This is what I'm reading now and/or have put holds on at the library:

    Elliott's Reading List Fall 2009
    Strikethrough indicates finished reading, and an asterisk (*) indicates recommended reading
    • The Unbearable Lightness of Being by Milan Kundera
    • Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close by Jonathan Safran Foer
    • The Zahir by Paolo Coelho
    • Everything is Illuminated by Jonathan Safran Foer
    • A Course in Miracles by The Foundation for Inner Peace
    • Moby Dick by Herman Melville
    • Shantaram by Gregory David Roberts
    • Juliet, Naked by Nick Hornby
    • Twenty Love Poems and a Song of Despair by Pablo Neruda

    Any ideas or recommendations?

    PS) I still blog at elliottwrites.blogspot.com, not here. This is just to capture whoever out in xangaland might still be interested in my blog and hasn't moved over there.

Friday, 07 August 2009

Wednesday, 18 March 2009

  • "Death"

    Today, after not hearing from her for a couple months, I got an e-mail from my friend (who is really my pen pal–we've connected so much more over e-mail in the last six months than we ever connected when we lived nearby and saw each other frequently) that explained why she had been so non-communicative.

    Her best friend died, of a drug overdose, not too long ago.

    She had dated, struggled and connected with, and loved this boy for a couple years. And now he's gone. Her e-mail was long and difficult to get through and I was crying toward the end. I don't know what to say about it. It seemed like something from a film (and I found myself thinking about turning it into a short story of sorts, but I don't know how I feel about that)–she broke up with him (for good reasons), he tried to re-connect with her, she sort of refused, and now he's gone and she never really got to tell him that she forgave him, that she still loved and would always love him...

    I suppose the moral is to do what your heart feels and reach out to the people you love because you never really know if what you've said to someone will be the last thing you ever say to them. But it's so much more complicated than that.

    I don't really know what to say. Hopefully I'll have a more substantial post about it once I work through it in my mind. I've never known anyone that died, really. At least never loved anyone that died.

    Have you ever known anyone that's died? How did you respond? Did you have closure? Do you have any regrets? Do you agree with Ben Gibbard, "Love is watching someone die?" What does that quote mean to you?

Thursday, 26 February 2009

  • "Bobby Jindal's Lack of Listening"

    I watched president Obama's speech for the first time tonight. It was quite inspiring and quite timely. But while I voted for and very much admire Mr. Obama, there were parts I disagreed with. But at least I listened to it.

    I don't think that governor Jindal did. I did not listen to but only read his speech, and from what I've read that's good for him as it was apparently terribly delivered. As a rhetoric student, I believe that it is usually a good idea to actually listen to a speech in order to critique it, but after reading the text I politely (rhetorically?) refuse. The speech was appalling and it's no wonder that Republicans and Democrats alike have panned it.

    I got the feeling that Governor Jindal had his speech written beforehand, because almost all of his critiques were misguided talking points that seemed to attack traditional Democratic positions instead of the actual content of Obama's speech.

    Some examples: "The strength of America is not found in our government," says Jindal. "It is found in the compassionate hearts and the enterprising spirit of our citizens." Obama, of course, made the exact same claim: "The answers to our problems... lie... in the imaginations of our entrepreneurs and the pride of the hardest-working people on Earth." He also made it clear that we must rely on the government only because we are in a time of crisis, "Not because I believe in bigger government."

    Jindal critiqued the president's plans to raise taxes: "The way to lead is not to raise taxes... [it] is by empowering you, the American people." But, according to his speech, Obama isn't raising taxes. "If your family earns less than $250,000 a year, you will not see your taxes increased a single dime... a tax cut for 95% of working families."

    Jindal: "Their legislation... will... saddle future generations with debt."
    Obama: "[The legislation will] save our children from a future of debt."

    Jindal: "In Louisiana, we took a different approach... we cut more than 250 earmarks from our state budget."
    Obama: "I’m proud that we passed the recovery plan free of earmarks."

    Jindal: "To strengthen our economy, we also need to make sure every child in America gets the best possible education... charter schools..."
    Obama: "The... goal of this administration to ensure that every child has access to a complete and competitive education... we will expand our commitment to charter schools."

    Jindal:" We must promote confidence in America by ensuring ours is the most ethical and transparent system in the world... We need to bring transparency to Washington, D.C."
    Obama: "[The government] will be held accountable by me and the American people for every dollar they spend... we have created a new website called recovery.gov so that every American can find out how and where their money is being spent."

    Did governor Jindal listen to Obama’s speech before delivering his own? It doesn’t seem like it. How would you have responded to president Obama's speech?

Wednesday, 04 February 2009

  • "Some Perspectives on Peace"

    I was looking through some old papers and found these documents I was given at some workshops I went to while attending the American Humanics Management Institute in early January. It's good.

    A Soulforce Credo About My Adversary

    1. I believe that my adversary is also a child of the Creator, that we are both members of the same human family, that we are sisters and brothers in need of reconciliation.

    2. I believe that my adversary is not my enemy, but a victim of misinformation as I have been.

    3. I believe that my only task is to bring my adversary truth in love (nonviolence) relentlessly.

    4. I believe that my adversary's motives are as pure as mine and of no relevance to our discussion.

    5. I believe that even my worst adversary has an amazing potential for positive change.

    6. I believe that my adversary may have an insight into truth that I do not have.

    7. I believe that one day my adversary and I will understand each other and that if we conduct our search for truth guided by the principles of love, we will find a new position to satisfy us both.

    (Based on principles of Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. and Mahatma Gandhi)"

    What do you think about this? Is this that revolutionary, or are they all pretty basic things about living a peaceful existence? Which ones are hard for you? Personally, I think that not trying to analyze my opponent's motivation is very difficult. I think that Number 6 is maybe the most important. Which one do you think is the most important?

    Selected Quotes from the Jewish Tradition

    "Charity outweighs all other religious precepts." Talmud, Bava Batra

    "If you want to raise a man from mud and filth, do not think it is enough to keep standing on top and reaching down to him a helping hand. You must go all the way down ourself, down into the mud and filth. Then take hold of him with strong hands and pull him and yourself out into the light." Hasidic Rabbi Solomon ben Meir ha-Levi of Karlin

    "A community that has no house of worship and no shelter for the poor must first provide for the poor." Sefer Hasidim

    "If a person comes to you for assistance and you tell him, "God will help you," you are acting disloyally to God. For you should understand that God has sent you to aid the needy person, not to refer him back to the Almighty." Rabbi Leover

    "It is not incumbent upon you to complete the work, but neither are you free to desist from it." Rabbi Tarfon

    "The merit of charity is so great that I am happy to give to one hundred beggars even if only one might truly be in need; some people, however, act as if they are exempt from giving charity to one hundred beggars in the event that one of them might be a fraud." Rabbi Chaim of Sanz

    What do you think about these? Which ones of these do you agree with? I especially like the third one - what does that make you think about megachurches, and churches in general? The fourth one makes me think of the book of James, specifically chapter 2, verses 15-17. The last one is the one that stuck with me. Aren't we all like those "some people?" We think, when a beggar asks for money, that he's going to go spend it on booze or drugs. So what? It's not for us to know what he's going to do with it. What if she is going to go buy the only food her children will eat that day? What if he is raising money to take the bus to a shelter where he's going to turn his life around. You don't know, so it's about assuming the best in people, or something like that.

    Anyways, I just thought I'd share.

elliottwrites

  • Visit elliottwrites's Xanga Site
    • Name: Elliott
    • Location: Los Angeles
    • Member Since: 2/14/2006
"Cheers to the unloved! May the laugh maniacally the day they find what they������¯������¿������½re looking for..."

-Drew Lindo

About Me

[no info]

Pulse

elliottwrites has no pulse!...